Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:53680 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932950Ab0KQEmS (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:42:18 -0500 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so5913382qyk.19 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:42:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1289959503.29119.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <1289867251-21559-1-git-send-email-javier@cozybit.com> <1289946246.3673.12.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1289959503.29119.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> From: Javier Cardona Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:41:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] iw: Resolve namespace clash between station plink and vlan commands To: Johannes Berg Cc: nbd@openwrt.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:41 -0800, Javier Cardona wrote: > >> > I'll happily take this, but would you prefer to have the other one >> > backed out instead? >> >> That would save us and some of our clients from having to change a >> bunch of scripts, yes. > > Actually, I won't have time today, but it looks like they can be shared > in some way? Maybe by sharing the same callback function or something? I > mean -- it should be possible to do two things on set... not sure now, > I'll take a look later. Maybe you can work with an older iw version > until then? We tried that at first but could not get the usage message right in case of missing parameters. If you can suggest a solution to this, we'll be happy to implement it. Cheers, Javier -- Javier Cardona cozybit Inc. http://www.cozybit.com