Return-path: Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:50098 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767Ab0KVH2T (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2010 02:28:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:26:57 +0100 From: Stefan Richter To: Bruno Randolf Cc: Bob Copeland , Johannes Berg , Jouni Malinen , linville@tuxdriver.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, peterz@infradead.org, blp@cs.stanford.edu, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lars_Ericsson@telia.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kevin.granade@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] nl80211/mac80211: Report signal average Message-ID: <20101122082657.43a2ad91@stein> In-Reply-To: <201011221141.19250.br1@einfach.org> References: <20101112024901.28522.21895.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <201011191749.31974.br1@einfach.org> <20101119150451.1c0d273f@stein> <201011221141.19250.br1@einfach.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Nov 22 Bruno Randolf wrote: > On Fri November 19 2010 23:04:51 Stefan Richter wrote: > > You only showed that CPU utilization is not so high that an effect on > > network throughput can be seen. You did not measure what the increase > > in CPU utilization actually was. :-) > > True. That's exactly the point: "CPU utilization is not so high that an effect > on network throughput can be seen", which was what people were worrying about. No, people worried about CPU utilization that can be reduced. > So IMHO: No problem! :) But of course it makes sense to optimize and I'll try > to do that in subsequent patches. Good. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- =-== =-==- http://arcgraph.de/sr/