Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:59775 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933263Ab0KQCDa (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:03:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] iw: Resolve namespace clash between station plink and vlan commands From: Johannes Berg To: Javier Cardona Cc: nbd@openwrt.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1289867251-21559-1-git-send-email-javier@cozybit.com> <1289946246.3673.12.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:05:03 -0800 Message-ID: <1289959503.29119.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:41 -0800, Javier Cardona wrote: > > I'll happily take this, but would you prefer to have the other one > > backed out instead? > > That would save us and some of our clients from having to change a > bunch of scripts, yes. Actually, I won't have time today, but it looks like they can be shared in some way? Maybe by sharing the same callback function or something? I mean -- it should be possible to do two things on set... not sure now, I'll take a look later. Maybe you can work with an older iw version until then? johannes