Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] rt2x00: Fix rt2800 USB TX Path DMA issue
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>,
	Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>,
	jay_hung@ralinktech.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com,
	Walter Goldens <goldenstranger@yahoo.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=qM417Cu2m_pb7unQs3wpcUcrTPftiKfAFvF=8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201011131911.47346.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
	 <201011161742.08503.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
	 <20101116165302.GA29570@sig21.net>
	 <201011161800.40654.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
	 <AANLkTi=ANfE3s8RUmS5=qyofqHM2geRnatK-eCUjovEc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20101116190654.GA3659@sig21.net>
	 <AANLkTi=qM417Cu2m_pb7unQs3wpcUcrTPftiKfAFvF=8@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:26:43 -0800
Message-ID: <1289935603.3673.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 20:23 +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:

> However what I meant, is when skb->priority is 0, must the highest or the lowest
> priority be assumed? If it is the highest priority, then rt2x00 uses
> the incorrect
> naming, and all what is needed is to rename the fields everywhere in rt2x00.
> However is it is the lowest priority, then the naming is correct, and we must
> change the meaning, in which case we must rename and meaning.

I'm working on this:
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/patches/kernel/all/LATEST/012-mac80211-ac-defines.patch

0 is highest prio (AC_VO)

johannes