Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:55839 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752156Ab0L1JIG (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2010 04:08:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mac80211: Extend channel to frequency mapping for 802.11j From: Johannes Berg To: Jouni Malinen Cc: Bruno Randolf , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20101228090102.GA22580@jm.kir.nu> References: <20101224074410.16337.90008.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <1293447459.3544.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <201012281431.46536.br1@einfach.org> <1293525513.3526.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <20101228090102.GA22580@jm.kir.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:08:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1293527282.3526.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 11:01 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:38:33AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Not really. I guess it seems fine. Do you know if there are ever any > > starting values used other than 4900 and 5000? > > Quite a few.. At least 4.85 GHz and 3.0 GHz for 20 MHz channels and more > for 5 and 10 MHz channels (4.9375 GHz, 4.89 GHz, 3.0025 GHz, 4.0025 GHz, > 5.0025 GHz) in channels defined by IEEE 802.11. That's what I kinda thought ... doesn't that mean this patch is insufficient? johannes