Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:37893 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754941Ab0L3SwU (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:52:20 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] bridge: fix br_multicast_ipv6_rcv for paged skbs From: Johannes Berg To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Tomas Winkler , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20101230104656.6c5a4b4e@nehalam> References: <1293708753-17728-1-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <20101230104656.6c5a4b4e@nehalam> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 19:52:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1293735134.21956.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 10:46 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This doesn't look correct. The calculation of the offset doesn't look correct. > Just following the skb_clone(), the skb_pull value is "offset". > Also, the other checks return -EINVAL for incorrectly formed packet. > > --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c 2010-12-30 10:29:58.579510488 -0800 > +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c 2010-12-30 10:43:27.273386691 -0800 > @@ -1464,6 +1464,9 @@ static int br_multicast_ipv6_rcv(struct > if (offset < 0 || nexthdr != IPPROTO_ICMPV6) > return 0; > > + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, offset)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > /* Okay, we found ICMPv6 header */ > skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); > if (!skb2) Wouldn't that make more sense after the clone anyway? But if you look at my email, you'll find that there's potentially, and conditionally, more stuff that will be read from the skb's header, which hasn't necessarily been pulled in, so I think this still won't fix all the issues. Seeing how this only affects some ICMPv6 packets, maybe we should just use skb_copy() instead? johannes