Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:40867 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755257Ab0LHRuU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:50:20 -0500 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so1243257vws.19 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:50:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <201012061714.15863.br1@einfach.org> <20101208165607.GE2423@tuxdriver.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:50:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ath5k: Weird Retransmission Behaviour From: Sedat Dilek To: Bob Copeland Cc: "John W. Linville" , Bruno Randolf , Jonathan Guerin , linux-wireless , ath5k-devel , nbd@openwrt.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Bob Copeland wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:56 AM, John W. Linville >> wrote: >>>> Found the patch: >>>> >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/359722/ >>> >>> Are you posting that for merging?  Or just for testing? >> >> Testing -- I only compile tested it but it seemed relevant >> to this thread. > > Also, I should note that the retry limits are fixed at > minstrel initialization time; I don't know if that's the > right time to take the config parameters into account > or if it should be done later (and if later, how that fits in > with minstrel's MRR strategy). > > -- > Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > I have applied, compiled and loaded new mac80211 kernel-module. What could be a good test-case? - Sedat -