Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.19.149.2]:50692 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752061Ab0LOFvs (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:51:48 -0500 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.107]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:51:33 -0800 Message-ID: <4D085761.2020203@atheros.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:21:29 +0530 From: Mohammed Shafi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luis Rodriguez CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , Senthilkumar Balasubramanian Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Make PM-QOS value as user configurable References: <1292312908-6182-1-git-send-email-mshajakhan@atheros.com> <20101214162513.GC6190@tux> In-Reply-To: <20101214162513.GC6190@tux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 14 December 2010 09:55 PM, Luis Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:48:28PM -0800, Mohammed Shajakhan wrote: > >> From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan >> >> This patch allows the pm-qos value to be user configurable by making it as >> a module parameter.This will help our customers to configure the pm-qos >> value according to the effect in throughput due to the DMA latency problem >> which was observed in Intel Pinetrail platforms. >> The tested value of '55' will be filled as the default >> pm-qos-value incase the user does not specifies pm-qos value as a >> module parameter. >> example usage: sudo modprobe ath9k pmqos=65 >> > Where is this documented though? Can you please add some > > /* > * some good docs > */ > > of some sort as a followup patch? Thanks! > Ok sure. > Luis > . > >