Return-path: Received: from mail.deathmatch.net ([72.66.92.28]:4270 "EHLO mail.deathmatch.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756410Ab0LIMwl (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:52:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:38:41 -0500 From: Bob Copeland To: Helmut Schaa Cc: Jonathan Guerin , Bruno Randolf , linux-wireless , ath5k-devel , nbd@openwrt.org Subject: Re: ath5k: Weird Retransmission Behaviour Message-ID: <20101209123841.GA31566@hash.localnet> References: <201012061714.15863.br1@einfach.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 10:21:34AM +0100, Helmut Schaa wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Jonathan Guerin wrote: > > I only seem to have Minstrel as the only available Rate Control > > algorithm in my kernel config? > > PID is only selectable on embedded platforms: > > config MAC80211_RC_PID > bool "PID controller based rate control algorithm" if EMBEDDED > > Just remove the "if EMBEDDED" from net/mac8011/Kconfig and retry. For what it's worth, I tested pid and minstrel a while ago with a modified mac80211_hwsim, and found minstrel to be quite a bit better at rate adaptation. So while it may be worth testing out for this particular use case, minstrel is probably the way to go in general. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com