Return-path: Received: from mail30f.wh2.ocn.ne.jp ([220.111.41.203]:11303 "HELO mail30f.wh2.ocn.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757407Ab0LHBNg (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:13:36 -0500 Received: from vs3014.wh2.ocn.ne.jp (125.206.180.187) by mail30f.wh2.ocn.ne.jp (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 2-052648812 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:13:34 +0900 (JST) From: Bruno Randolf To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: Use capabilities information for the number of TX queues Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:13:06 +0900 Cc: ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <20101207020812.17506.40803.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20101207140120.GA2700@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20101207140120.GA2700@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201012081013.06034.br1@einfach.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue December 7 2010 23:01:21 John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:08:12AM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote: > > One thing I missed in my WME series: Older hardware does not have enough > > hardware queues to support WME. In this case we just set up one data > > queue. Use the capability information to decide how many queues to set > > up. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf > > > > -- > > > > resend, seems like it got lost somewhere in a queue ;) > > Did you originally post with a different subject? The MARC archive > doesn't seem to see any prior posting. Sorry, I accidentially posted only to the ath5k lists before. My fault. bruno