Return-path: Received: from 80-190-117-144.ip-home.de ([80.190.117.144]:37968 "EHLO bu3sch.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754337Ab0LIOlu (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:41:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] b43: set TMS to work with current band width for N-PHY From: Michael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=FCsch?= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , b43-dev@lists.infradead.org In-Reply-To: (sfid-20101209_152344_283295_FFFFFFFFF86E6A27) References: <1291755360-21570-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <1291755360-21570-3-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <1291756117.27497.101.camel@maggie> <1291904384.2905.2.camel@maggie> (sfid-20101209_152344_283295_FFFFFFFFF86E6A27) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:41:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1291905704.2905.9.camel@maggie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 15:23 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > W dniu 9 grudnia 2010 15:19 użytkownik Michael Büsch napisał: > > On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 15:13 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> W dniu 9 grudnia 2010 15:12 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki napisał: > >> > W dniu 7 grudnia 2010 22:08 użytkownik Michael Büsch napisał: > >> >> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 21:55 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> >>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki > >> >>> --- > >> >>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c | 6 ++++++ > >> >>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_common.c | 7 +++++++ > >> >>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_common.h | 2 ++ > >> >>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 7 ------- > >> >>> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >> >>> > >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c > >> >>> index fa48803..670fd7b 100644 > >> >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c > >> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c > >> >>> @@ -1150,6 +1150,12 @@ void b43_wireless_core_reset(struct b43_wldev *dev, u32 flags) > >> >>> > >> >>> flags |= B43_TMSLOW_PHYCLKEN; > >> >>> flags |= B43_TMSLOW_PHYRESET; > >> >>> + if (dev->phy.type == B43_PHYTYPE_N) { > >> >>> + if (b43_channel_type_is_40mhz(dev->phy.channel_type)) > >> >> > >> >> Is channel_type already set at this time? The more I think about this, the wronger it looks to me. Why do we care about the channel type at reset time anyway? I guess the channel type is a parameter that can change any time on an operating card. So just unconditionally set B43_TMSLOW_PHYCLKSPEED_80MHZ at reset time and set the correct TMSLOW bits later when channel_type is actually changed. That seems to be the only sane thing to do. I guess we don't want to fully reset the device when channel_type changes, do we? -- Greetings Michael.