Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:60707 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754081Ab1AaVvU (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:51:20 -0500 Subject: RE: Review of EN 301 893 1.5.1 and 1.6.1 changes From: Johannes Berg To: Michael Green Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless , "wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org" , Kathy Giori , David Quan , "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <93781E992CBA7843962D8B0E7D683F3C16FE767CC6@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com> References: <1296510225.3812.50.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <93781E992CBA7843962D8B0E7D683F3C16FE767CC6@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:51:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1296510680.3812.51.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:49 -0800, Michael Green wrote: > Luckily, the "harmonized standard" is by law, one and only one for DFS > conformance across all European Community countries. > > There are no differences in pulse patterns, non occupancy, channel > close time, etc etc. across EU countries. I have not gotten any > indication from anywhere that there will be deviation on a country by > country basis in Europe affecting DFS rules. > > BTW, as of June 30, 2010, EN301 893 V1.5.1 became mandatory. All > devices placed on the EC market must meet those latest pulse patterns > per V1.5.1. I realise that. I'm just not convinced we'll have 1.9.1 in 2012. johannes