Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:52438 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752065Ab1AGPxU (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:53:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4D2736DA.5090105@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 07:52:58 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Stuge CC: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net" Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: Keep track of stations for debugfs. References: <1294361165-15308-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <1294361165-15308-3-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <4D267E4D.7000608@candelatech.com> <20110107024909.GD20431@tux> <4D2685CC.7020502@candelatech.com> <20110107153607.11061.qmail@stuge.se> In-Reply-To: <20110107153607.11061.qmail@stuge.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/07/2011 07:36 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: >>> but at least other clueless users would not go over stable limit >>> you have found. >> >> I think it's very likely that the problems I find are general >> issues that are just much easier to hit with lots of stations. > > I strongly support this. I recognize several of your problems from my > attempts at using ath9k with only a single STA which was all but stable. Please do (re)post the info against the latest wireless-testing. It might help me and others see something we're missing when trying to debug problems we see ourselves. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com