Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59118 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752705Ab1AZQfJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:35:09 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pi8Kn-0001Qf-3O for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:35:05 +0100 Received: from san_juan-143-68.umh.es ([san_juan-143-68.umh.es]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:35:05 +0100 Received: from baldo.ath9k by san_juan-143-68.umh.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:35:05 +0100 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Baldomero Coll Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: support for IEEE80211N in IBSS Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <201101191438.01161.alexander.simon@saxnet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, I've already test this patch, but I'm not pretty sure if I'm doing something wrong. I've applied the patch on the compact-wireless-2-.6.37-4.tar.bz2. When I create the ibss network and set the channel 1 HT20 It seems that all is going right. How could i know if the wireless interface is really configured in HT mode? I have transmitted a large file between two laptops and It's not possible to appreciate performance differences with the simple channel 1. Baldo