Return-path: Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:59282 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752557Ab1AGCeD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:34:03 -0500 Received: by iyi12 with SMTP id 12so15421110iyi.19 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:34:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19750.30510.548719.848168@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <19749.32067.311517.479374@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19749.37051.292861.996698@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19750.24410.495583.789895@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19750.30510.548719.848168@gargle.gargle.HOWL> From: Daniel Halperin Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 18:33:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v2] cfg80211: Add HT BSS attributes To: Sujith Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Sujith wrote: > Daniel Halperin wrote: >> Yeah, me too. ?Isn't greenfield mode (whether there are legacy devices >> around) part of the operating capabilities and should be supported by >> hostapd? > > Yes, hostapd does check if there are non-GF stations in the BSS and updates > the HT operation mode parameters. But the nl80211 interface hook is currently > not implemented. > right.. so don't we want this patch? :) Sorry if I'm being obtuse Dan