Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:34856 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754121Ab1AaUQS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:16:18 -0500 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so2147419gyb.19 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:16:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1296504395.3069.651.camel@pimenta> References: <1296472589-26401-1-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <1296472589-26401-7-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <1296473043.3812.10.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1296475910.3812.27.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1296504395.3069.651.camel@pimenta> From: Arik Nemtsov Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:16:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] mac80211: add HW flag for disabling auto link-PS in AP mode To: Luciano Coelho Cc: Johannes Berg , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 22:06, Luciano Coelho wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:11 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:49 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 13:24, Johannes Berg >> wrote: >> > > It'd be nicer if you could separate out mac80211 patches, but then >> Luca >> > > needs to hold off merging until John picked up the mac80211 patch. >> > >> > Yea that would complicate matters a bit. Does the ordering of the >> > patches bother you? >> >> It just makes it more complicated for me to pick out the right thing >> -- >> I almost missed that there was a mac80211 patch in this huge series. > > Yes, I totally agree with Johannes. ?I prefer that > mac80211/cfg80211/whatever_other_stuff be sent as separate series, so > that there's not confusions about who applies what. ?If the patches are > in the same series, I always need to ask John to either take them all or > not. > > The ideal is if you send mac80211 patches separated from wl12xx and > mention the dependency on the wl12xx series, so I'm aware and wait for > John's integration before taking the wl12xx stuff in. Sure thing. I'll separate the patches. Arik