Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:51475 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753610Ab1AYWBe (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:01:34 -0500 Message-ID: <4D3F4832.4080907@candelatech.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:01:22 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John W. Linville" CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 09/11] ath9k: Try all queues when looking for next packet to send. References: <1294643513-18820-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <1294643513-18820-10-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <20110125213710.GD2927@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20110125213710.GD2927@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/25/2011 01:37 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:11:51PM -0800, greearb@candelatech.com wrote: >> From: Ben Greear >> >> There can be multiple struct ath_atx_ac entries for each >> txq, so if the first one doesn't have any packets to send >> now, try the rest of them. This should help keep xmit >> going when using multiple stations, especially with AMPDU >> enabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear > > This one doesn't seem to apply any more. Can I persuade you to rebase > and resubmit it? I think this is already taken care of, or at least the important parts. Felix did some initial work in this area, and then I followed on with this one: ath9k: Try more than one queue when scheduling new aggregate. The only ath9k patches I have in my queue that are not upstream are: (From Louis Rodriguez) ath9k: warn when we get a ATH9K_INT_TIM_TIMER and are idle and my: ath9k: Implement rx copy-break. Which appears DOA as folks seem to like paged-skbs instead. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com