Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:49023 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751734Ab1A0RQP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:16:15 -0500 Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so2340220qwa.19 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:16:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4D41A275.2070704@lwfinger.net> References: <4D41A275.2070704@lwfinger.net> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:16:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mini PCIeWiFi card not detected in non-mini adapter From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: Larry Finger Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 27 stycznia 2011 17:51 użytkownik Larry Finger napisał: > On 01/27/2011 10:37 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> I've received mini PCIe adapter to PCIe x1 slot to test notebook cards >> inserted into PC.  Unfortunately after inserting my Broadcom card to >> it, it is not detected in "lspci" at all. >> >> My WiFi card used to work in "native" slot inside notebook. So if >> anything is broken, that would be PCIe x1 slot on motherboard or >> adapter itself. I've tested V and GND pins in my PCIe x1 slot, all >> work fine. I'll try get some other WiFi cards, to test my adapter >> tomorrow. >> >> However, maybe you have heard about some problems with such a >> adapters? Can there be sth preventing my card from being detected, >> visible? > > Does the adapter show up as a new bridge in lspci or in dmesg? No difference in lspci or dmesg. I've even tried lspci with every -A. I guess this adapter mostly reroutes pins, probably won't be visible as separated bridge itself. -- Rafał