Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:55014 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752355Ab1A3Kop (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jan 2011 05:44:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] nl80211: Pass probe response data to drivers From: Johannes Berg To: Arik Nemtsov Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Luciano Coelho , "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: References: <1295816579-28925-1-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <1295816579-28925-3-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <1295868924.3639.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1295950325.3650.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1296030720.3635.14.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1296134959.3622.37.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:44:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1296384282.3616.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:34 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > > Wait, no, I don't get it -- what does the nl80211 API have to do with > > how mac80211 manages it? I think for the nl80211 API the new command > > doesn't make a whole lot of sense. What happens in mac80211 I don't > > think matters much. > > I guess I misunderstood your original suggestion. Are you suggesting I > put the probe resp as part of the NL80211_CMD_SET_BSS cmd? > I'm ok with that. Yes, that's what I was thinking. johannes