Return-path: Received: from mail.academy.zt.ua ([82.207.120.245]:15413 "EHLO mail.academy.zt.ua" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756032Ab1BRXg0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:36:26 -0500 Received: from [10.0.2.42] by mail.academy.zt.ua (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50000022493.msg for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:35:47 +0200 Subject: Re: [RFC] AI support (2/14 ssb helpers) From: George Kashperko To: Michael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=FCsch?= Cc: linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <1298071777.23801.42.camel@maggie> References: <1297958316.5623.27.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> (sfid-20110217_170718_357395_57E8418D) <1297980093.13554.5.camel@maggie> <1297980484.23381.4.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> (sfid-20110217_231646_647052_FFFFFFFFEFB25F2A) <1298068149.23801.16.camel@maggie> <1298070945.25739.31.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> (sfid-20110219_002424_959914_4197FDC7) <1298071777.23801.42.camel@maggie> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:27:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1298071668.25739.35.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, > I should probably note that in my opinion ssb_bus is not the right place > to put ops that are supposed to abstract the SSB bus, too. ;) > _No_ SSB structure is the right place to put an ops pointer that is > supposed to abstract the SSB bus. Well, can't put it over ssb_bus struct yet :) Have nice day, George