Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:41637 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751204Ab1BZX2j (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:28:39 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtTYz-0001tr-K9 for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:28:37 +0100 Received: from 91-65-106-11-dynip.superkabel.de ([91.65.106.11]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:28:37 +0100 Received: from feldmann_markus by 91-65-106-11-dynip.superkabel.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:28:37 +0100 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Markus Feldmann Subject: searching for wireless card Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:28:41 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi All, i am searching for a wireless card with the following attributes: +linux compatible +b/g/n or a/b/g/n network compatible +opensource driver +productive and stable to use under Linux +not to old chip +atheros chip preferred +PCI +usable in Master Mode(Access Point) I still found some cards which are nice, but maybe too old: Linksys WMP300N (only b/g) D-Link DWA-547 (b/g/n, PCI ?) Some further Questions to help me decide: Is the Atheros Chip AR5xxx older than the AR9xxx? What is the advantage of 3 antennas instead of only 2 or 1? regards Markus