Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:64346 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752568Ab1BUQJf (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:09:35 -0500 Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so6231652wwa.1 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:09:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D628E37.7040503@lwfinger.net> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:09:27 -0600 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislaw Gruszka CC: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Dan Williams , Henry Ptasinski , Brett Rudley , Nohee Ko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , b43-dev Subject: Re: Request for free-distributable Broadcom's (G|LP)-PHY firmware References: <4CBF640C.4080405@broadcom.com> <1287674517.2383.7.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> <4D5EF0E9.4050908@lwfinger.net> <20110221095957.GA4568@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110221095957.GA4568@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/21/2011 03:59 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:21:29PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote: >> On 02/18/2011 03:24 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> Few months later, is there any progress? Can we expect: >>> >>> 1) Easier licensing of currently provided firmware (see Fedore case) >>> 2) Firmware for LP-PHY devices >>> ? >> >> I think we can forget this whole business. It seems that Broadcom is >> content with their business model, even though knowledgeable Linux >> users are avoiding their products like the plague. > > Broadcom will not release old firmware with redistributable license, > because of legal concerns, which are ridiculous for everyone except > them. > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-September/142893.html Did I tell you that I hate lawyers? Larry