Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:60241 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754203Ab1BIQpb (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:45:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:30:30 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Chaoxing Lin Cc: "'Zefir Kurtisi'" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC] DFS userspace handler Message-ID: <20110209163030.GD2494@tuxdriver.com> References: <1297252905-29739-1-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <4D52B7DB.8000000@neratec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 04:09:08PM +0000, Chaoxing Lin wrote: > I would vote for a dedidate DFS daemon. > > Straightforward name is better. > Beginners would be hard to understand why WDS/Mesh/IBSS mode requires a hostapd daemon which intuitively means for AP mode.. Perhaps it can be in wpa_supplicant instead? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.