Message-ID: <4D52D358.5050208@lwfinger.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:48:08 -0600
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: George Kashperko <george@znau.edu.ua>
CC: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SSB AI support code ([RFC3/11] SSB irqflag device op)
References: <1297258590.17400.37.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua>	 <1297261973.18053.20.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> <4D52BE92.5070503@lwfinger.net> <1297271450.3361.0.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua>
In-Reply-To: <1297271450.3361.0.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 02/09/2011 11:10 AM, George Kashperko wrote:
>> On 02/09/2011 08:32 AM, George Kashperko wrote:
>>> From: George Kashperko <george@znau.edu.ua>
>>>
>>> SB- and AI-style buses read irq flags from different locations.
>>> SB-ones read them from TPSFLAG whereas AI-ones from core oob register.
>>> In order to support both SB- and AI-style buses transparently
>>> irq flag accessor is implemented as ssb device op.
>>> Signed-off-by: George Kashperko <george@znau.edu.ua>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c       |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/ssb/main.c                  |    1 +
>>>  include/linux/ssb/ssb.h             |    5 +++++
>>>  include/linux/ssb/ssb_driver_mips.h |    1 +
>>>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> --- linux-next-20110203.orig/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c	2011-02-01 05:05:49.000000000 +0200
>>> +++ linux-next-20110203/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c	2011-02-07 16:39:46.000000000 +0200
>>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static const u32 ipsflag_irq_shift[] = {
>>>  	SSB_IPSFLAG_IRQ4_SHIFT,
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> -static inline u32 ssb_irqflag(struct ssb_device *dev)
>>> +u32 ssb_irqflag_sb(struct ssb_device *dev)
>>>  {
>>>  	u32 tpsflag = ssb_read32(dev, SSB_TPSFLAG);
>>>  	if (tpsflag)
>>> --- linux-next-20110203.orig/drivers/ssb/main.c	2011-02-07 16:35:50.000000000 +0200
>>> +++ linux-next-20110203/drivers/ssb/main.c	2011-02-07 16:49:40.000000000 +0200
>>> @@ -1367,6 +1367,7 @@ static const struct ssb_bus_ops ssb_ssb_
>>>  	.device_disable		= ssb_device_disable_sb,
>>>  	.admatch_base		= ssb_admatch_base_sb,
>>>  	.admatch_size		= ssb_admatch_size_sb,
>>> +	.irqflag		= ssb_irqflag_sb,
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  static int __init ssb_modinit(void)
>>> --- linux-next-20110203.orig/include/linux/ssb/ssb_driver_mips.h	2011-02-01 05:05:49.000000000 +0200
>>> +++ linux-next-20110203/include/linux/ssb/ssb_driver_mips.h	2011-02-07 16:39:10.000000000 +0200
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ extern void ssb_mipscore_init(struct ssb
>>>  extern u32 ssb_cpu_clock(struct ssb_mipscore *mcore);
>>>  
>>>  extern unsigned int ssb_mips_irq(struct ssb_device *dev);
>>> +extern u32 ssb_irqflag_sb(struct ssb_device *dev);
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  #else /* CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_MIPS */
>>> --- linux-next-20110203.orig/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h	2011-02-07 16:35:50.000000000 +0200
>>> +++ linux-next-20110203/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h	2011-02-07 16:38:34.000000000 +0200
>>> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct ssb_bus_ops {
>>>  	void (*device_disable)(struct ssb_device *dev, u32 core_specific_flags);
>>>  	u32 (*admatch_base)(struct ssb_device *dev, u32 adm);
>>>  	u32 (*admatch_size)(struct ssb_device *dev, u32 adm);
>>> +	u32 (*irqflag)(struct ssb_device *dev);
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  
>>> @@ -485,6 +486,10 @@ static inline u32 ssb_admatch_size(struc
>>>  {
>>>  	return dev->ops->admatch_size(dev, adm);
>>>  }
>>> +static inline u32 ssb_irqflag(struct ssb_device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	return dev->ops->irqflag(dev);
>>> +}
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  /* The SSB DMA API. Use this API for any DMA operation on the device.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>
>> This one fails to compile with the following error:
>>
>> drivers/ssb/main.c:1370:14: error: ‘ssb_irqflag_sb’ undeclared here (not in a
>> function)
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/ssb/main.o] Error 1
>> make: *** [drivers/ssb/] Error 2
>>
>> Larry
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> Well, might the problem here is again caused with mine wrong post of <[RFC9/11] SSB modify irqflag treatment>
> Could you please remove that one and reaply whole set of patches again.
> Sorry for inconveniences.

That cannot be the problem with this one. Each patch in a series MUST compile
correctly so that anyone that is bisecting the code always can build a kernel.
The code doesn't necessarily have to work correctly - that would be nice, but it
must compile. #3 fails this test.

Larry