Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:34968 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754597Ab1BBQhc (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:37:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110202133839.GA14904@jm.kir.nu> References: <1296633772.3624.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <20110202113052.GA14126@jm.kir.nu> <1296646434.5671.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <20110202133839.GA14904@jm.kir.nu> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:37:11 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Support for Android for mac80211 / cfg80211 802.11 drivers To: Jouni Malinen Cc: Johannes Berg , Bob Copeland , linux-wireless , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amod Bodas , Senthilkumar Balasubramanian , Sree Durbha , Deepak Dhamdhere , Xin Jin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:33:54PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: >> What's the driver_cmd things they use? If we they add support for >> whatever it is to nl80211, why can those not be normal supplicant >> interfaces? > > I have not reviewed what exactly gets used and how, so this is only > based on what the modification for wpa_supplicant are exposing. > > There seems to be some kind of mechanism for stopping/starting/reloading > the driver which I do not fully understand. It includes some kind of > driver hang detection and maybe recovery from that etc.. > > Then there is a very generic mechanism of passing any command from user > space (i.e., command string to a SIOCSIWPRIV) and that goes > transparently through wpa_supplicant.. The response comes back as a > string. In other words, you could implement pretty much anything in a > driver specific way with that.. At least following commands are used or > have used with that: RSSI, LINKSPEED, MACADDR, GETPOWER, GETBAND. > > Since it is difficult to tell just from wpa_supplicant changes what > exactly is done with these interfaces, the answer to the question of > why these could not be normal supplicant interfaces is not immediately > clear to me. I would assume that some of this functionality could > certainly be added once identified clearly what is needed. Some may > already be available (like MACADDR; assuming it is used to fetch local > MAC address). Sounds like Android kernel guys need to get their shit together. Why is this so hard? Luis