Return-path: Received: from 80-190-117-144.ip-home.de ([80.190.117.144]:33319 "EHLO bu3sch.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751192Ab1BNXIl (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:08:41 -0500 Subject: Re: Notes on ssb specs and implementation From: Michael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=FCsch?= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Larry Finger , b43-dev In-Reply-To: (sfid-20110215_000306_559821_FFFFFFFF9C6FCD67) References: <1297282621.9734.5.camel@maggie> <1297720877.5683.3.camel@maggie> <1297723925.5683.11.camel@maggie> (sfid-20110215_000306_559821_FFFFFFFF9C6FCD67) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:08:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1297724913.5683.12.camel@maggie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 00:02 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > W dniu 14 lutego 2011 23:52 użytkownik Michael Büsch napisał: > > On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 23:32 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> Sure. It's not for submission, so you have to expect magic values. > > > > That patch doesn't look too bad. > > Should we commit such a patch? Even if we didn't notice it to improve anything? I think it should wait until you got the device working. But once it works, it should be committed. -- Greetings Michael.