Return-path: Received: from smtp208.alice.it ([82.57.200.104]:37460 "EHLO smtp208.alice.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751144Ab1B0PM7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:12:59 -0500 Subject: Re: searching for wireless card From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli To: Markus Feldmann Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:12:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1298819570.2933.2.camel@gnutoo-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 00:28 +0100, Markus Feldmann wrote: > Hi All, > > i am searching for a wireless card with the following attributes: > +linux compatible > +b/g/n or a/b/g/n network compatible > +opensource driver > +productive and stable to use under Linux > +not to old chip > +atheros chip preferred > +PCI > +usable in Master Mode(Access Point) I'm using an ath9k in AP mode, and it seem to work well for me. My card is a PCI one. altough no a only b/g/n: wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn Mode:Master Frequency:2.442 GHz Tx-Power=20 dBm And I use only g, I'm not sure if n works yet. > > I still found some cards which are nice, but maybe too old: > Linksys WMP300N (only b/g) > D-Link DWA-547 (b/g/n, PCI ?) > > Some further Questions to help me decide: > Is the Atheros Chip AR5xxx older than the AR9xxx? > What is the advantage of 3 antennas instead of only 2 or 1? ath9k is more recent and its driver seem more actively developed than ath5k. Denis.