Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:38550 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752482Ab1BSJYJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:24:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Implement op_flush() From: Johannes Berg To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1298106822-9411-1-git-send-email-vasanth@atheros.com> References: <1298106822-9411-1-git-send-email-vasanth@atheros.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:24:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1298107440.3725.8.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 01:13 -0800, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > When op_flush() is called with no drop (drop=false), the driver > tries to tx as many frames as possible in about 100ms on every > hw queue. During this time period frames from sw queue are also > scheduled on to respective hw queue. Given how long HW queues currently are, I wouldn't set the timeout to 100ms -- mac80211 has no expectation how long this will take, although 100ms seems pretty long I'm not sure it'll always be sufficient? johannes