Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:55626 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755966Ab1BSAWN (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:22:13 -0500 Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so211486gyh.19 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:22:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D5F0D2D.8050908@lwfinger.net> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:22:05 -0600 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: George Kashperko CC: linux-wireless , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?el_B=FCsch?= Subject: Re: [RFC] AI support (13/14 ssb add AI support) References: <1297958316.5623.27.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> (sfid-20110217_170718_357395_57E8418D) <1297980093.13554.5.camel@maggie> <1297981882.23381.38.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> (sfid-20110217_233956_707110_FFFFFFFFBE33FFA6) <1298069145.23801.29.camel@maggie> <1298070443.25739.23.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> (sfid-20110219_001605_010946_FFFFFFFFA70C4DCA) <1298071637.23801.40.camel@maggie> <4D5F04C0.4080707@lwfinger.net> <1298072855.25739.55.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> <4D5F0990.2060004@lwfinger.net> <1298074131.25739.65.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> In-Reply-To: <1298074131.25739.65.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/18/2011 06:08 PM, George Kashperko wrote: > Hi, > >> On 02/18/2011 05:47 PM, George Kashperko wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>> I don't want to get involved in the debate over abstraction, but FWIW, the >>>> patchset does work for PCI-based SSB devices. >>>> >>>> Larry >>>> >>> Could you please let me know if you tried last code I've posted, as my >>> original RFC was indeed embeddables' targeted and won't work for >>> SSB-over-PCI. >>> Last code I've posted I've tested on SSB over PCIE host and it was >>> pretty much working. >> >> I tested the 14 patches you posted on 2/17/2011 that arrived about 10:20 UTC. >> >> Larry >> > Ohh, I skrewed again -.- > Donno how but I decided It didn't work for you. I'm too much sleepy, but > can't go sleep till coffee let me off. Sorry. The first set of patches you posed didn't build due to the MIPS problem, but the second set built and worked. Larry