Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64642 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753754Ab1BUKAy (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:00:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:59:58 +0100 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Larry Finger Cc: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Dan Williams , Henry Ptasinski , Brett Rudley , Nohee Ko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , b43-dev Subject: Re: Request for free-distributable Broadcom's (G|LP)-PHY firmware Message-ID: <20110221095957.GA4568@redhat.com> References: <4CBF640C.4080405@broadcom.com> <1287674517.2383.7.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> <4D5EF0E9.4050908@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <4D5EF0E9.4050908@lwfinger.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:21:29PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote: > On 02/18/2011 03:24 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >Few months later, is there any progress? Can we expect: > > > >1) Easier licensing of currently provided firmware (see Fedore case) > >2) Firmware for LP-PHY devices > >? > > I think we can forget this whole business. It seems that Broadcom is > content with their business model, even though knowledgeable Linux > users are avoiding their products like the plague. Broadcom will not release old firmware with redistributable license, because of legal concerns, which are ridiculous for everyone except them. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-September/142893.html That sucks.