Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:56737 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753109Ab1BWPQO (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:16:14 -0500 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so3141105vws.19 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:16:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D652498.4090507@lwfinger.net> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:15:36 -0600 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luciano Coelho CC: "John W. Linville" , Sebastien Jan , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] WLAN: fix the path to the wl12xx firmwares References: <1298467516-9092-1-git-send-email-s-jan@ti.com> <1298471599.2104.44.camel@pimenta> <20110223144134.GA2729@tuxdriver.com> <1298472865.2104.48.camel@pimenta> In-Reply-To: <1298472865.2104.48.camel@pimenta> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/23/2011 08:54 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 09:41 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: >> >> I think there are a number of other drivers with embedded pathnames. > > Indeed. And, as discussed with Johannes on IRC, the / will be just one > more character in the FW name, regardless of whether it means a > subdirectory or not. It's just part of the FW name string. > > When I apply the patch, I just need to brace for the loads of people > complaining that the FW cannot be found anymore and explain the issue a > hundred times. ;) You could keep the old path as a fallback for a couple of cycles and log a message warning users to move their firmware. Larry