Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41251
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751200Ab1CPR7a (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:59:30 -0400
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20110316.110008.183049273.davem@davemloft.net>
To: jpirko@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	linville@tuxdriver.com, kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: net-next-2.6 status...
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110316175642.GB2867@psychotron.redhat.com>
References: <20110316073803.GB2780@psychotron.redhat.com>
	<20110316.103857.226773145.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20110316175642.GB2867@psychotron.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:56:44 +0100

> So would you leave out if.h hunk out or should I repost?

What makes you think it's a good idea for me to have to do more work?

I have the entire merge window and thousands of other patches to worry
about...