Return-path: Received: from purkki.adurom.net ([80.68.90.206]:56016 "EHLO purkki.adurom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753377Ab1CHHnz (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:43:55 -0500 To: Christian Lamparter Cc: Michael Buesch , Johannes Berg , "linux-wireless" Subject: Re: Powersave broken on p54 References: <1299003142.6461.12.camel@maggie> <201103021813.52719.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <1299086257.13604.17.camel@marge> <201103021918.30528.chunkeey@googlemail.com> From: Kalle Valo Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:43:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <201103021918.30528.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (Christian Lamparter's message of "Wed\, 2 Mar 2011 19\:18\:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87oc5m2h1i.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christian Lamparter writes: > On Wednesday 02 March 2011 18:17:37 Michael Buesch wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 18:13 +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote: >> > sure there was the rssi->dbm update (I hope you've already updated >> > your eeprom image.) >> >> What change to the eeprom is needed? My eeprom doesn't >> contain any rssi info (see recent NULL ptr fix). > > I think you should (re-)add it, I don't know what the > firmware is doing with it, but maybe Kalle knows more? Most probably it's just to get good rssi values for received frames which is passed to the host. I doubt that the rssi calibration values are used anything useful inside the firmware. But as always, anything is possible :) -- Kalle Valo