Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:36084 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752543Ab1CPJz7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 05:55:59 -0400 Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9so241869pzk.19 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1300268390.3761.14.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:55:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix comment regarding aggregation buf_size From: Emmanuel Grumbach To: Daniel Halperin Cc: Johannes Berg , John Linville , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51, Daniel Halperin wrote: > That last line should really be: > >>> + * ? ? Note that the following is also illegal because it will violate buffering assumptions if frame 1 is lost again agreed - the Txer cannot send any frame with seqNum greater than SSN from last BA reponse + window size. In this case, the SSN of last BA is 0, so you cannot send 8 and any further frame until you get the BA response for 1. >>> + * ? ? ?- TX: ? ? ? ? 189..... >> >> Dan >> >