Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:56279 "EHLO mail-qy0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756929Ab1CRQEh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:04:37 -0400 Received: by qyg14 with SMTP id 14so3514200qyg.19 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:04:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1300463925.13499.118.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> References: <1300449773-11255-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <1300453433.13499.18.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> <1300460342.13499.60.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> <1300463925.13499.118.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:04:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ssb: separate common scanning functions From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: George Kashperko Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_B=C3=BCsch?= , b43-dev@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2011/3/18 George Kashperko : > My english is awful therefore seems we missunderstood each other. I'm > sure I got your point right - you plan to start up the new (bcmb) > project for both sb and ai support. No, no, no. My bcmb is not expected to be project for both buses. It is expected to provide helper functions for *two separated* drivers: ai and ssb. I don't want to duplicate ssb_core_name (already implemented in ssb) in my ai. That way I put it in bcmb_scan.c. I can now use ssb_core_name in both: ssb and ai without double, duplicated implementation. I'm still reading your earlier e-mail... -- Rafał