Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42726 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751656Ab1CPHCO (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 03:02:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20110316.000251.189704695.davem@davemloft.net> To: jpirko@redhat.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, kaber@trash.net Subject: Re: net-next-2.6 status... From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20110316065008.GA2780@psychotron.redhat.com> References: <20110315.160124.104058374.davem@davemloft.net> <20110316065008.GA2780@psychotron.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jiri Pirko Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:50:09 +0100 >>Jiri, I know there is your patch set there, but I think you and Changli >>still need to go back and forth one more time wrt. orig_dev semantics. >>Since you have been posting this patch set for some time I'm still >>willing to apply it for this merge window, but please make haste and >>work out the remaining discussion. Thank you. > > Dave, you can apply the rest of the series and leave only the first > patch (af_packet) out. There's no dependency. We will figure out things > around origdev later. I was about to do that but I've found other problems. You cannot make the modifications you make to linux/if.h, those interface flags are visible to userspace.