Return-path: Received: from mail-yi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:59513 "EHLO mail-yi0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751994Ab1DGVth (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:49:37 -0400 Received: by yia27 with SMTP id 27so1211519yia.19 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:49:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D9E316E.4000908@lwfinger.net> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:49:34 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jett Chen CC: wireless Subject: Questions about rt2800usb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I know from experience that the staging driver rt82860sta has been replaced by rt2800pci and I plan to push a patch deleting the driver from staging. It appears that rt2870sta has been replaced by rt2800usb. Is that correct? If so, I will also include the deletion of that driver from staging in the patch. I noticed that rt2870sta includes a few USB IDs not found in rt2800usb, namely: 0x2001:0x3c09, 0x2001:0x3c0a, and 0x2019:0xed14. Any reasons why these should not be included in rt2800usb? Please let me know of any objections to removing those two staging drivers. Thanks, Larry