Return-path: Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:59332 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758797Ab1DYSu1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:50:27 -0400 Received: by iyb14 with SMTP id 14so2059403iyb.19 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:50:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4DB550A3.9040204@t-online.de> References: <4DB550A3.9040204@t-online.de> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:50:07 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20110425_205030_516600_6CD4B882) Subject: Re: Prefer specific wireless standard To: =?UTF-8?Q?Richard_Sch=C3=BCtz?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Richard Schütz wrote: > I want to prefer 5 GHz access points over 2.4 GHz access points in an > environment where both types are available with the same SSID, because the > load on the 5 GHz cells is much lower and they also support HT40. Is there a > way to reach this without forcing the client to connect to one specific > access point and as a result losing roaming capability? Sounds like supplicant heuristics you can work on. Luis