Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:37130 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751073Ab1D2Dbd (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:31:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20110428.203100.193725173.davem@davemloft.net> (sfid-20110429_053138_672898_37F09573) To: padovan@profusion.mobi Cc: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2011-04-25 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20110429031143.GA2353@joana> References: <20110425.130435.112597353.davem@davemloft.net> <4DB5DFBC.3070203@lwfinger.net> <20110429031143.GA2353@joana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:11:43 -0300 > * Larry Finger [2011-04-25 15:55:24 -0500]: > >> Unfortunately, the 64-bit variant of gcc v4.5.1 will miss some of these. I find >> I need to compile code on a 32-bit system and using an older compiler to catch >> all. Perhaps that explains the error that crept through here. > > That could be a reason, I have gcc 4.5.2 (64-bit). I've built this code many times > before send pull request and never saw that warning, and it's clearly a bug, > indeed. I would buy this line of reasoning. Except that I do all of my test builds with 64-bit gcc's, on sparc64 and x86-64.