Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:56477 "EHLO
	mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752318Ab1DKPdP (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:33:15 -0400
Message-ID: <4DA31F37.90503@lwfinger.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:33:11 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Walter Goldens <goldenstranger@yahoo.com>
CC: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gwingerde@gmail.com, xose.vazquez@gmail.com, ben@decadent.org.uk,
	users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Shiang Tu <shiang_tu@ralinktech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2800pci: rt2800usb: Firmware update
References: <779506.13049.qm@web161604.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <779506.13049.qm@web161604.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On 04/11/2011 10:18 AM, Walter Goldens wrote:
>> Update firmware for rt2800pci to Version 34 and firmware
>> for rt2800usb to
>> Version 29.
>
> Are there any changelogs for these firmware files? Do they only offer support for newer chips, or are there any actual improvements and bug fixes implemented? Users should know whether updating the firmware will be of any use to them.

I am not sure of the details and will need info from Ralink on this question. 
Perhaps Shiang Tu can supply it.

Larry