Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:45602 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758391Ab1D2DLe (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:11:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:11:43 -0300 From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" To: Larry Finger Cc: David Miller , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2011-04-25 Message-ID: <20110429031143.GA2353@joana> (sfid-20110429_051157_756276_B3E455D6) References: <20110425193017.GC28814@tuxdriver.com> <20110425.125835.189703400.davem@davemloft.net> <20110425.130435.112597353.davem@davemloft.net> <4DB5DFBC.3070203@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4DB5DFBC.3070203@lwfinger.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Larry Finger [2011-04-25 15:55:24 -0500]: > On 04/25/2011 03:04 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: David Miller > > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:58:35 -0700 (PDT) > > > >> From: "John W. Linville" > >> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:30:17 -0400 > >> > >>> Here is another big batch of updates intended for 2.6.40... > >>> > >>> There is the usual huge batch of changes for ath9k, and iwlagn, a bunch > >>> for ath9k_htc, rt2x00, and ath5k, a few more for mwifiex, and a handful > >>> of others. Also included is a big batch of Bluetooth updates as well. > >>> > >>> Please let me know if there are problems! > >> > >> Pulled, thanks a lot John. > > > > I guess watching the build logs for new warnings is too old fashioned > > for people, and besides Dave will do it for everyone anyways right? > > > > And this one is a real bug too. :-/ > > > > I'll push this out to net-next-2.6 on top of the wireless-next pull, > > but please be more mindful in the future. > > Unfortunately, the 64-bit variant of gcc v4.5.1 will miss some of these. I find > I need to compile code on a 32-bit system and using an older compiler to catch > all. Perhaps that explains the error that crept through here. That could be a reason, I have gcc 4.5.2 (64-bit). I've built this code many times before send pull request and never saw that warning, and it's clearly a bug, indeed. -- Gustavo F. Padovan http://profusion.mobi