Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog102.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.69]:42046 "EHLO na3sys009aog102.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757885Ab1ELUKj (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 16:10:39 -0400 Received: by mail-ey0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 13so840760eye.17 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] wl12xx: add ps completion event From: Luciano Coelho To: Eliad Peller Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1305104068-32240-7-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> References: <1305104068-32240-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <1305104068-32240-7-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:10:34 +0300 Message-ID: <1305231034.12586.1038.camel@cumari> (sfid-20110512_221042_399733_07EF6CF6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:54 +0300, Eliad Peller wrote: > Signal when psm was entered successfully, if the completion > variable is being set. > > Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller > --- > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/event.c | 7 +++++++ > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/event.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/event.c > index ae69330..21e52ed 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/event.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/event.c > @@ -135,6 +135,13 @@ static int wl1271_event_ps_report(struct wl1271 *wl, > > /* enable beacon early termination */ > ret = wl1271_acx_bet_enable(wl, true); > + if (ret < 0) > + break; > + > + if (wl->ps_compl) { > + complete(wl->ps_compl); > + wl->ps_compl = NULL; > + } > break; > default: > break; > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h > index daf941d..cf08a9d 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h > @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ struct wl1271 { > unsigned int rx_filter; > > struct completion *elp_compl; > + struct completion *ps_compl; > struct delayed_work elp_work; > struct delayed_work pspoll_work; > This patch doesn't make sense by itself, without the next one. Can you squash them? -- Cheers, Luca.