Return-path: Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:56802 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751197Ab1EGE4q convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 May 2011 00:56:46 -0400 Received: by vxi39 with SMTP id 39so4068831vxi.19 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:56:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4DC4BF99.3050101@candelatech.com> References: <4DBF1967.9010604@candelatech.com> <4DC042A5.9050806@candelatech.com> <4DC17DAE.9020808@candelatech.com> <4DC47C04.1080604@candelatech.com> <4DC4BF99.3050101@candelatech.com> Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 12:56:46 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20110507_065649_970207_E6343839) Subject: Re: Looking for 3x3 Atheros NICs using ath9k driver. From: Adrian Chadd To: Ben Greear Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , ath9k-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 7 May 2011 11:42, Ben Greear wrote: >> Ok, there's likely some PCI init bugs going on here; would someone >> with more background in this please take a look? > > I haven't had a chance to try this on the Atom system with the > latest 39-rc6+ kernels.. ?I'll try that on Monday. > > The VIA system was running 39-rc6+, btw. Thanks! I do hope it's not ath9k. :-) Adrian