Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:55643 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759191Ab1EBOpy (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2011 10:45:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 10:37:58 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Luciano Coelho Cc: Arik Nemtsov , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wl12xx: support FW TX inactivity triggers Message-ID: <20110502143757.GD2544@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20110502_164557_671112_74299CF1) References: <1303849311-8817-1-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <1304329855.12586.234.camel@cumari> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1304329855.12586.234.camel@cumari> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:50:55PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote: > Hi John and Arik, > > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 00:09 +0300, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > > Hey John, > > > > Looking at the latest git, it seems you've picked up this patch > > (commit 47684808fd89d6809c0886e06f8ac324252499d8). > > This is unfortunate, since there's currently a FW bug that will cause > > many disconnections in STA mode with this patch. > > > > How would we go about reverting this? > > I have reverted this patch in the wl12xx.git tree. This required a bit > of merging and we needed the revert in order to proceed with our tests. > > So, John, please don't revert this in your tree. My revert will come in > my next pull-request which will come in a couple of days, after our > internal test round is done. > > Thanks! OK, sounds good. FWIW, this is what I meant when I said "Do the wl12xx guys still want this?" Granted, that was about the other patch in the series, but I kinda presumed that they were related... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.