Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:45187 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751401Ab1EJUEi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 16:04:38 -0400 Message-ID: <4DC99A4A.7030701@candelatech.com> (sfid-20110510_220441_247880_74B152E0) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:04:26 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felix Fietkau CC: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, lrodriguez@atheros.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.39] ath9k: fix a regression in PS frame filter handling References: <1304972747-11775-1-git-send-email-nbd@openwrt.org> <20110510193914.GF2520@tuxdriver.com> <4DC9996E.2050801@openwrt.org> In-Reply-To: <4DC9996E.2050801@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/10/2011 01:00 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2011-05-10 9:39 PM, John W. Linville wrote: >> This doesn't seem to apply against wireless-2.6... >> >> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:25:47PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>> Only leave filtering enabled for AP or VLAN interfaces, clear the >>> destination mask for all other interfaces. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau >>> Reported-by: Ben Greear > > Ben: You mentioned to me that you bisected the regression to my AP > powersave related change with 2.6.39-rc6, however this change does not > appear to be in the 2.6.39 tree at all, so you were probably running a > bisect on w-t, which has a lot more stuff than w-2.6. > > John: Doesn't seem to be relevant for .39 after all, just queue it for > .40 then. I did run bisect on w-t, and it seems I was confused about it being in mainline -rcX. Sorry for the trouble. Makes me feel a little better though...glad it wasn't in real kernels and still I was the only one hitting it :P Ben > > - Felix -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com