Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:48390 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751955Ab1ELOnN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 10:43:13 -0400 Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so1352604bwz.19 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:43:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <19903.49991.848934.183819@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19908.11423.898062.510184@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19912.44045.774181.844464@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19912.55320.817869.173186@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19912.55857.505921.694732@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19912.57383.634547.405469@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19913.25619.615324.60744@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19914.42954.285439.226672@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:42:56 -0400 Message-ID: (sfid-20110512_164316_964591_603C6DA5) Subject: Re: error initializing AR7010+AR9280 Xbox 802.11n adapter From: George Nychis To: Sujith Cc: Mark Davis , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Steven Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tried on a second machine with no luck still... could he get me his exact build and firmware? On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:33 AM, George Nychis wrote: > BTW - was this with your updated firmwares you sent me, or with the > standard 1.2 firmware? > > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:22 AM, George Nychis wrote: >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Sujith wrote: >>> George Nychis wrote: >>>> Great, thanks Sujith! ?Are we positive that the Xbox adapter is also >>>> not UB94 now that we have seen both of these with this problem? ?I am >>>> not sure if this was speculation after seeing the initial error, or if >>>> it is a known fact. >>> >>> Yes, the Xbox adapter is not based on UB94. >>> >>> And apparently no changes are required to use UWA-BR100, as an internal >>> engineer was able to use ath9k_htc as is, after adding the PID/VID >>> to the driver. So maybe the card that you have bought is different >>> from the UWA-BR100 sample that he used. Will poke some more people and >>> see if we're missing something. >>> >> >> Maybe if we can compare lsusb of both devices to ensure that they are >> actually the same. >> >> Could you have him read what the FCC ID is on the back of the stick? >> My details are: >> >> IC: 409B-UWABR100 >> FCC ID: AK8UWABR100 >> ANATEL: 0010-10-4749 >> >