Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:60292 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755715Ab1EJPN1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 11:13:27 -0400 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so1772707qyk.19 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 08:13:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4DC9542C.6060508@hauke-m.de> References: <684215.94213.qm@web161615.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4DC9542C.6060508@hauke-m.de> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:13:26 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20110510_171331_120407_6E08943F) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] compat-wireless: enable RT33XX and RT53XX support. From: Ivo Van Doorn To: Hauke Mehrtens Cc: Walter Goldens , mcgrof@gmail.com, lrodriguez@atheros.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 05/10/2011 04:44 PM, Walter Goldens wrote: >> >>> This is based on a patch by Walter >>> Goldens. >> >> Hi Hauke, >> >> I think RT53XX is still experimental, unlike the RT33XX. Should we enable it from config.mk now? >> >> Walter > > Hi Walter, > > In the description of RT53XX there is no warning that this is not > working, like it is in the description of RT35XX. I do not have such a > device, but the rt2x00 guys could probably help on this questing. If we > enable it and it does not work it will not hurt people more that we do > not activate it. > > @rt2x00 people: Are the RT53XX chips working with the most recent > version of the rt2x00 driver from wireless-testing? The following config options are all marked as unstable (they depend on EXPERIMENTAL) RT2800PCI_RT35XX RT2800PCI_RT53XX RT2800USB_RT35XX RT2800USB_RT53XX Since recently I have an RT53xx USB device, but I haven't tested it yet. As far as I heard from other reports the status is the same as 35xx. Ivo