Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:46429 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751752Ab1EGQtc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 May 2011 12:49:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4DC57383.3050903@broadcom.com> References: <1304632783-8781-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <201105061605.31625.arnd@arndb.de> <1304776555.16344.2.camel@maggie> <4DC57383.3050903@broadcom.com> Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 18:49:30 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20110507_184954_374619_8FFF70E9) Subject: Re: [PATCH][WAS:bcmai,axi] bcma: add Broadcom specific AMBA bus driver From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: Arend van Spriel Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_B=C3=BCsch?= , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "John W. Linville" , "b43-dev@lists.infradead.org" , Greg KH , =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_B=C3=BCsch?= , Larry Finger , George Kashperko , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Russell King , Andy Botting , linuxdriverproject , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2011/5/7 Arend van Spriel : > On 05/07/2011 03:55 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: >> >>> Arnd: did you have a look at defines at all? >>> >>> Most of the defines have values in range 0x800 → 0x837. Converting >>> this to array means loosing 0x800 u16 entries. We can not use 0x800 >>> offset, because there are also some defined between 0x000 and 0x800: >>> #define BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER           0x367   /* Out of band */ >>> #define BCMA_CORE_INVALID              0x700 > > Please be aware that the core identifier itself is not unique (in the > current list they are). In the scan the BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER will always > show BCMA_MANUF_ARM (did not look up the proper manufacturer define but you > get the idea, i hope). Unfortunately, I don't. Could you explain this? How core identified can be not unique? Can 0x800 mean ChipCommon but also SuperPCIeX? -- Rafał