Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:62866 "EHLO
	mail-gw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751274Ab1E0IGr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 27 May 2011 04:06:47 -0400
Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so600429gwa.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 27 May 2011 01:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimgLTw2A27qtfHPdM3-tKf29xFGVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <24ECC725-EA49-48CA-8B9D-FDD71BD257A0@cs.washington.edu>
	<BANLkTi=Hxaj+mDm5Ecqut2hxefNHyuO8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=3mGWzGghuip2xyo+24yd2mJXfUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimgLTw2A27qtfHPdM3-tKf29xFGVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:06:46 +0800
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=0wo+io1LjUwP-Rgy5qH=Qv+v_nw@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110527_100652_709760_51E1EA2D)
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] ath9k: fix two more bugs in tx power
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Halperin <dhalperi@cs.washington.edu>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@kernel.org, blaise@willowgarage.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On 27 May 2011 15:58, Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com> wrote:

> yes, but I am not sure whether this configuration from eeprom is
> needed for AR9003?
> if they are hardcoding the data from eeprom may return 0 ?

No idea, I don't know the AR9003 code yet. :)

> hmmm in ath9k not exactly the same is there,
> ? REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_POWER_TX_SUB,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ATH9K_POW_SM(pModal->pwrDecreaseFor3Chain, 6)
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ATH9K_POW_SM(pModal->pwrDecreaseFor2Chain, 0));

Hm, I'm not sure what that's for. Is it for per-packet TPC?



Adrian