Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([147.243.128.24]:63418 "EHLO mgw-da01.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751678Ab1EIK3U (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 06:29:20 -0400 Subject: Re: wireless-regdb US and CA settings incorrect? From: Juuso Oikarinen To: "ext Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Michael Green , "ext John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org In-Reply-To: References: <1304594478.3749.61.camel@wimaxnb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 13:28:59 +0300 Message-ID: <1304936939.3749.115.camel@wimaxnb> (sfid-20110509_122924_183130_617924FB) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 08:57 -0700, ext Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Juuso Oikarinen > wrote: > > Hi John, all, > > > > The following is an excerpt of the db.txt from most recent > > wireless-regdb. > > > > country US: > > (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (3, 27) > > (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (3, 17) > > (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5490 - 5600 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5650 - 5710 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5735 - 5835 @ 40), (3, 30) > > > > country CA: > > (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (3, 27) > > (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (3, 17) > > (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5735 - 5835 @ 40), (3, 30) > > > > We are under the understanding that the Canadian national rules deny the > > usage of the 5490-5710 range of frequencies (ref from RSS-210), but the > > range is present in the allowed range of frequencies for the CA region: > > > > "Additional requirements for the band 5600-5650 MHz: Until further > > notice, devices subject to this Section shall not be capable of > > transmitting in the band 5600-5650 MHz, so that Environment Canada > > weather radars operating in this band are protected." > > > > Then again, the FCC rules (15.407) do not prohibit the mentioned range > > of frequencies within the US (with DFS and limited power level) but in > > the regulatory database that range is missing. > > > > > > Is there a bug in the regulatory db, or am I misunderstanding something? > > > Michael, any opinion on this? Any take on this one? -Juuso